60s kitchen: Restrained use of shape and color creates a timeless, modern look
A timeless 1964 kitchen to celebrate the weekend. Reasons to like this one:
- Beautifully put together – an airy white background graphically punched up with wood cabinet doors, cone-shaped light fixture, seat cushions and even napkins. Meanwhile, you see right through the wire chairs, continuing the airy and open feel.
- The large-scale wallpaper on the door to the laundry room is fabulous. What a great touch – to take something old fashioned – a botanical fruit, in this case – and treat it in an iconic way to bring it solidly into the modern era. So Andy Warhol. I am going to see if I can find a wallpaper like this.
- Notice the painted paneling over by the phone, and yes – the Pennsylvania Dutch (or Scandinavian?) style placemats. Either way, you know that I love this country kitsch thrown in. You simply cannot take your room too seriously.
- Finally, is that terrazzo on the floor? Yum.
Related posts:
- Paint color for a red brick and wood ranch house I‘VE ALWAYS ADMIRED THIS HOUSE three blocks or so from...
- Danish modern interior with Bradbury’s Mod Generation wallpaper Color is so funny. You never know how it...
- Wood paneling — time for a comeback? I‘ve been holding off for a while on posting...
- Mid-century modern bedroom — lovely I think that our readers in Eichler homes and other...
- Mid-century modern flooring from Amtico Cindy’s new kitchen and dining room floor is perfect for...
Comments
5
This is a nice kitchen. It looks fun, yet sensibly laid out.
As for the wallpaper on the door, I’ve been considering putting some type of covering on the door to our half bath that is off of a bedroom. It’s a hollow core door with what probably is birch veneer, but the veneer is all shredded at the bottom. It’s the side that faces out into the bedroom, yet most of the time it’s open and swung into the bathroom. We’ve looked for another such door but haven’t found the right size.
If I put wallpaper on it, could I put it right over the veneer? I had been thinking of fabric or bulletin board cork or mirrors, but wallpaper probably would be the easiest to work with. This could be my big start into wallpapering.
Pam – did you notice the chair in front of the sink?! It is interesting to me that you pointed out the terrazzo floors as I have been thinking of incorporating them into our face-lift plan. I know that I’ve seen terrazzo in Florida mid-century homes – have you found them in other areas of the country? Do you know anything about them?
Hi Sleeping Bee Alice, I have a good reference on terrazzo, and will do a post on it this week. It is a very serious process – heavy – and requires several inches of subfloor with which to work. So, I think it’s the kind of application that needs to be on the slab.
Hi Sue, Perhaps a solution for the bathroom door would be to put a new layer of veneer on it?
Pam,
I want to bring up the larger idea here – that of “Timelessness”. To do that, I’ll simply use a conversation I had with “Better Homes and Gardens” (Meredith Publishers) Designer Matt Strelecki:
“Ronn,
I’d have to agree with you about the 60/70s overlap you discuss in your last News/Opinion article “Decorating your home during War Time”. Although I’m a few years younger than you, the late 60s and early 70s was the first time period that I noticed design. Although I look back in disdain at that time period, I’m always trying to figure out why it was determined to be good design at the time. Of course, the same can be said of any definable era but each one should have this basic question asked of it after it moves out of fashion. What aspects may become timeless versus a flash in the pan? Was it all mass hysteria or was there something there?
The aesthetic you discuss in the designer’s rooms ( http://www.designspongeonline.com/2008/03/ilse-crawford.html#commentswas ) is basically an update of that time period, IMO. Nothing really new about it but it does offer the question of how we “re-digest” old forms and visual attitudes and make them appear to be new.
Why does something come back into fashion while other eras are never resurrected?
The simple answer is that good stuff comes back around but that’s not always the case. Even the awful 70s will see its day in the sun again.
God help us when it does.
Matt”
—
Matt,
I’ve always felt that a Past is revived first from a current cultural need, which only then causes the market to kick in. The cultural need is much more interesting to me, since the market is mere reflexive opportunism.
The cultural need to revive a Past (true, rumored, or concocted) is based on contemporary social insecurities, and adds hoped-for weight – validation – truth – stability – to current psychic needs of that population. I.e., we USE selective pieces of Pasts for our Present needs.
If a particular Past isn’t revived, it’s because we don’t need it. In that sense, the “Zeitgeist” is as opportunistic as the market – but without the consciousness.
There’s ALWAYS “something there”, whether or not you like “it”. Everything we make and do (and think?) is an indicator of our time. It is entirely unavoidable. It is like the air we inhale and exhale. They are inseparable though slightly altered.
However, I don’t accept the concept of “Timeless”. No one has ever proven to me ANY single THING from ANY single TIME has a single component of “timeless” (not even nudity in painting, because body types, hair styles, etc. go in and out of fashion!). All Time is Flash-in-the-Pan. The insecure society gives added weight to a Past by labeling it “Timeless” only to transfer that added weight to a Present.
And, if you think about it, we have NEVER actually WANTED that pure concept of “Timeless”. Humans want those who are gone to have left behind results which express that era… or at least the best of that era… or at least best as defined by us… at least for now. This way we may – MAY – understand a little something beyond our noses today.
Face it, we live in constant conflict over the function and value of the Past.”
—
So what do YOU think?
Ronn.