<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing: &#8220;Mid-Century Modest&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retrorenovation.com/2009/10/26/introducing-my-new-term-mid-century-modest-and-the-mid-century-modest-manifesto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retrorenovation.com/2009/10/26/introducing-my-new-term-mid-century-modest-and-the-mid-century-modest-manifesto/</link>
	<description>Remodeling, decor and home improvement for old homes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:16:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: atomicbowler-dave</title>
		<link>http://retrorenovation.com/2009/10/26/introducing-my-new-term-mid-century-modest-and-the-mid-century-modest-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44489</link>
		<dc:creator>atomicbowler-dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retrorenovation.com/?p=18512#comment-44489</guid>
		<description>Personally, I just dig on anything that is true, relatively simple, and honest in it&#039;s intent, construction and design. In other words, real.
I feel like...in the main...this reflected the mainstream values and intentions of a populace, to some degree at least. Contrast this with &quot;mine&#039;s bigger so hence I&#039;m better&quot; and the inherent dishonesty involved with cultured stone, hardee siding with genuine woodgrain look, and laminate hardwood floors. Fake. False. Sad. Dishonest by design, since they are sold on 30 year notes while mainly being built to a national code that requires the structure to be viable for a minimum of 23 years! 
3 cheers for real, for honest, for the tangibly enduring!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I just dig on anything that is true, relatively simple, and honest in it&#8217;s intent, construction and design. In other words, real.<br />
I feel like&#8230;in the main&#8230;this reflected the mainstream values and intentions of a populace, to some degree at least. Contrast this with &#8220;mine&#8217;s bigger so hence I&#8217;m better&#8221; and the inherent dishonesty involved with cultured stone, hardee siding with genuine woodgrain look, and laminate hardwood floors. Fake. False. Sad. Dishonest by design, since they are sold on 30 year notes while mainly being built to a national code that requires the structure to be viable for a minimum of 23 years!<br />
3 cheers for real, for honest, for the tangibly enduring!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emily</title>
		<link>http://retrorenovation.com/2009/10/26/introducing-my-new-term-mid-century-modest-and-the-mid-century-modest-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44486</link>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retrorenovation.com/?p=18512#comment-44486</guid>
		<description>Whatever you think is fine by me. I&#039;m off to post a photo of my little house. Thanks, Pam!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you think is fine by me. I&#8217;m off to post a photo of my little house. Thanks, Pam!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pam kueber</title>
		<link>http://retrorenovation.com/2009/10/26/introducing-my-new-term-mid-century-modest-and-the-mid-century-modest-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44482</link>
		<dc:creator>pam kueber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retrorenovation.com/?p=18512#comment-44482</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so happy you are finding happiness in your mid-century modest home, emily! and, i took your cue - and started &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/groups/1265107@N25/pool/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a new flickr group called Mid-Century Modest Homes&lt;/a&gt;. What should we &quot;allow&quot; in it (as I always think it&#039;s best to be focused - more powerful that way). I think: exteriors only. Is that okay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so happy you are finding happiness in your mid-century modest home, emily! and, i took your cue &#8211; and started <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/1265107@N25/pool/" rel="nofollow">a new flickr group called Mid-Century Modest Homes</a>. What should we &#8220;allow&#8221; in it (as I always think it&#8217;s best to be focused &#8211; more powerful that way). I think: exteriors only. Is that okay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

