C

Choosing wallpaper for Matt’s new blue and gray bathroom designed to look like it’s always been there

Matt has been constructing this blue and gray tiled bathroom in his 1959 home — all from scratch — oh my — it’s fabulous! Now, it’s time to choose wallpaper. He’s found a contender but sends in this question: Does his wallpaper choice have an authentic midcentury look? I opine.

Matt writes:

I’ve been recreating a blue / gray bathroom since early last year, and I’m finally at the point where we choose wallpaper. We found a pattern we really like that has a blue / gray scheme that’s similar to our tile and fixtures with a yellow accent.

You would have to see the colors (I have a couple of pictures) but I’m wondering how authentic this might be? I don’t see very many blue bathrooms, let alone blue with a hint of yellow anything mixed in there. For what it’s worth If we go with this I’m thinking white towels so it would be just a pop of color.

Our goal is something that looks like it’s been there since the house was built in 1959. It’s basically down to wallpaper, building the hamper, someone changing our salvaged green bathtub to blue, and small details so we’re getting really close to the end! 

The bathroom is changing quickly though, for example if our two year old cooperates the countertop may be tiled by the end of the weekend. Likewise the tub I’m hoping can be enameled in blue soon.
 
The tile and plumbing supply fixtures are new. Cabinets, lighting and other fixtures are salvaged. We’ve used a lot of the resources available here for tile and fixtures, by the way. We’re definitely glad all of it was available.

Choosing wallpaper that looks authentic to the midcentury era

Fun wallpaper, Matt, and what a job on that bathroom — kudos!
 
But to answer your question(s) directly: (1) No, I do not think your wallpaper choice has the look of actual wallpaper you would have seen in the 1940s, 1950s or 1960s or even earlier. My reasons are technical rather than color-related. And (2) The colors are fine — except for that bright white field.

 

“The look” of vintage wallpaper vs. much of today’s wallpaper

I am not expert on the technical language, but here goes:
  1. Old paper was printed using actual rollers — actual ink laid down, layer after layer until the desired design was achieved.
  2. The paper stock also was — pretty paper-y — they can be tricky to install for that reason — they may tear or otherwise be brittle or fragile.
  3. From a design perspective, old wallpapers also often had metallic inks…
  4. They often had striations in their background…
  5. More typically than not, I’d say, they had relatively small patterns… and, I’ll say:
  6. Few bright (blue) whites / mostly yellowed pinked off-whites.
Bradbury’s Atomic Doodle in Turquoise has on off-white field in a smaller pattern, and it’s hand-printed.
 
Many of today’s widely available wallpapers, on the other hand, are digitally printed on paper that is more water-fast. That means, you don’t see, so finely, the laid-down layers of paint. The finish is more washable — typically a vinyl coating with satin finish; this also makes it stronger so the paper is easier to install. Regarding the aesthetics: The patterns may be larger — as with yours. 
 
A vintage bathroom wallpaper from Rosie’s Vintage Wallpaper
So…  If you want a paper that looks truly authentic to the time — if you want time-capsule look — look for vintage or a paper that’s still printed with real inks using rollers or similar technology. 
ALL THAT SAID, unlike tile — which is forever — wallpaper is jewelry — it can be changed out at far less cost and hassle. And, it folks did change their wallpaper out over time. So if you like the “new retro” aesthetic and don’t mind if a super-expert knows in a glance that it’s not true “time capsule”, go for it!

  1. Maria says:

    Matt,

    As someone who grew up in a 1959 house since it was new, I can attest to the fact your atomic choice is almost an exact replica of the original mom had in our house, but a different color wave. If you want to go atomic, I say go for it!

    Another choice, as mentioned above, that was common for the time period, would be swans or the like. I’ve seen them on a similar blue background with reflective silver highlights. However, that’s a completely different look/feel than atomic. Go for what you like, you live there!

  2. Donna S says:

    Wallpaper aside, I have the same American Standard waterfall sink and toilet in my 1961 home. Bemis makes colored toilet seats and you may find one that matches. My other bathrooms also have the original pink and emerald green sinks and toilets, and I would never think of replacing them. Enjoy your new/old bathroom. Please post the final results.

    1. KakiMack says:

      I second the Bemis suggestion. We found great matches for our two bathrooms—one pink and one green. And they even come in soft close! Matt, I like the atomic wallpaper—I think it’s a great idea to bring in the yellow.

    2. Bruce Garibotti says:

      The would be a fine choice and something that would be popular. Yet, when I saw it, I thought reproduction and it being sideways. It strikes me as something that was made to look the way we think it would have looked. Most of the repro stuff seems to be loaded with sputnik and boomerang elements. The designs come across as trying a bit too hard. This design is nice, though.

  3. Paula Bailey says:

    Go with the atomic with the touch of yellow. It “pops” and makes the blue and grey tile come alive. The others are just there.

  4. Margie C. says:

    I love your atomic choice! You can definitely accent with white or yellow towels or mats or cups. I remember the days when toilet paper (and paper towels) came in colors. Pale blue toilet paper would look swell in there. Have fun with it, and congrats on a great job!

  5. Tonya Newton says:

    I am the designer of the wallpaper that Matt originally chose.

    1. The wallpaper is sideways. The diamonds should be tall and not wide.

    2. The wallpaper is printed at Spoonflower where artists like me have control over the colors and design. If the white is too white, all a person has to do is contact me through Spoonflower and ask for a muted beige or a light grey background, or whatever color is to the liking of that customer. Changes for these kind of things are easy peasy.

    3. I’m in the pool with those that say you don’t always have to do vintage everything. I like to mix it up, personally. That’s why I started doing art. I didn’t like what was available to me, vintage-wise, so I created vintage-inspired pieces (paintings at that time) to go with my authentic 1950s-60s furnishings which at the time was in a very 1980s mobile home, btw. Over the years, I learned how to create art that could be used for fabric and wallcoverings that stay true to my mid century inspried aesthetic. I understand if you have a 1953 home and you feel you must fill it with anything and everything from 1953 but there are some of us who like to mix it up and there’s nothing wrong with that. What I find funny is how some are praised for this while others are shamed. No shame here.

    1. Pam Kueber says:

      Hi Tonya, Thanks for your comment and congrats on all your great work as an artist.

      I do want to clarify, my comments as to choice were all based on answering Matt’s explicit question which included this goal::

      Our goal is something that looks like it’s been there since the house was built in 1959.

      As such, I recommended true vintage.

      I agree, there are no police here saying you can’t or shouldn’t mix old and new. In fact, I spotlight many midcentury “style” products.

Leave a Reply

Commenting: Information

All comments are moderated, generally within 24 hours. By using this website you are agreeing to the site's >> Terms of Service, << which include commenting policies, and our >> Privacy Notice. << Before participating, read them in full.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.